The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been received to reopen the claim of service connection for penile lesion, which was previously denied in September 2002. The Veteran's testimony and medical records provide additional probative information relating to unestablished facts necessary to substantiate this claim.
The deciding factor: The submitted medical reports show a current abnormality on the Veteran's penis and his testimony of chronic, recurring problems related to penile lesions, which are material as they relate to unestablished facts necessary to substantiate the claim of service connection for penile lesion.
- Claimed conditions
- penile lesion
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- May 20, 2010
- Citation
- 1018717
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1018717.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection of a penile lesion, finding that it is not related to his service-connected epididymitis.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient medical opinion regarding the relationship between the Veteran's penile lesion and his service-connected epididymitis. The AOJ is instructed to obtain additional records, provide another opportunity for the Veteran to submit evidence, and seek an addendum opinion from a VA physician.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient medical opinion regarding whether the Veteran's penile lesions are caused or aggravated by his service-connected epididymitis. The VA is instructed to obtain an addendum opinion from a urologist and ensure all pertinent records are obtained.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for a penile lesion, which the Veteran claimed was secondary to his service-connected epididymitis. The appeal is currently pending due to an incomplete medical opinion regarding whether the penile lesion was aggravated by the service-connected condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.