The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for a chronic skin disorder, including as due to exposure to Agent Orange, finding no new and material evidence that related his current condition to his military service.
The deciding factor: The submitted evidence did not provide any new or non-redundant competent evidence relating the Veteran's current chronic skin disorder to his military service, including as due to Agent Orange exposure.
- Claimed conditions
- chronic skin disorder, skin rash, dermatitis
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- Agent Orange / herbicides
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- May 28, 2010
- Citation
- 1019865
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1019865.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The appeal for service connection for a left wrist condition was dismissed due to concurrent election of higher-level review. The claims for an initial compensable rating for bilateral pes planus, and for service connection for hearing loss, neck strain, and dermatitis were denied.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection, higher ratings, and earlier effective dates, as well as dismissed his claim for a TDIU.
- Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for right and left ankle disabilities, a skin rash, and denied service connection for bilateral hearing loss, shortness of breath, PTSD, OSA, cervical spine disability, lumbar spine disability, knee disabilities, CPS, and earlier effective dates.
- Denied
The Board denied compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for left toe pain and loss of range of motion, finding that the Veteran's condition was a normal post-surgical outcome. The claims for service connection for dermatitis and HSV were remanded due to inadequate medical opinions.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.