The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for the grant of service connection for residuals of jaw fracture is denied as there was no formal or informal claim prior to June 25, 2004.
The deciding factor: The claim lacks legal merit because the effective date is determined by the date the Veteran filed his original claim with VA, which was on June 25, 2004.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of jaw fracture
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 2, 2010
- Citation
- 1020163
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1020163.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for sleep apnea and an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for residuals of jaw fracture, finding that there is no evidence to support a link between these conditions and his military service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for a left knee disorder, sleep apnea, residuals of jaw fracture, and persistent depressive disorder with anxious distress (depression) due to insufficient evidence or need for further examination.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including PTSD and other conditions, make it impossible for him to obtain or maintain gainful employment consistent with his educational background and work history. The Board has granted a TDIU effective from November 29, 2012.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that additional development is needed to determine the relationship between the Veteran's claimed jaw fracture residuals and pilonidal cysts and his military service. The case will be remanded for this purpose.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.