The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to issues related to service connection and reopening of a claim for lesions on the body. The Veteran's lung condition is being considered under direct service connection, while his claims for lesions are being evaluated in light of potential presumptive service connection based on Gulf War exposure.
The deciding factor: The decision was remanded because the Veteran did not receive proper VCAA notice regarding the need to establish a nexus between his current disability and service, as well as the need to submit new and material evidence for reopening his claim for lesions. The case is now being reviewed with these considerations in mind.
- Claimed conditions
- Interstitial lung disease
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 30, 2010
- Citation
- 1024471
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1024471.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for service connection of interstitial lung disease and lung nodules to obtain a clarifying medical opinion, as the previous VA examination was found to be inadequate.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for further development and re-adjudication due to an incomplete records search regarding potential service in Vietnam and inadequate explanation of why certain diagnoses were combined.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for interstitial lung disease and rheumatoid arthritis as new and relevant evidence has been received, warranting readjudication.
- Denied
The Board denied a rating in excess of 30 percent for coronary artery disease and remanded the claim for interstitial lung disease due to an inadequate VA examination.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.