The Board found that the Veteran does not have current residuals of scarlet fever and denied service connection for both scarlet fever and atrial fibrillation, including as secondary to scarlet fever. The VA doctor reviewed the file and concluded that the Veteran's atrial fibrillation is not related to his scarlet fever.
The deciding factor: The VA doctor opined that the Veteran's current atrial fibrillation is not related to his scarlet fever, which only lasts a few days with no long-term complications.
- Claimed conditions
- scarlet fever, atriial fibrillation
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 12, 2010
- Citation
- 1025809
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1025809.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for scarlet fever and a heart disability based on new and relevant evidence, but remanded the claims of entitlement to service connection for scarlet and/or rheumatic fever and a heart disability.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for the Veteran's heart disability including atrial fibrillation, stable angina, supraventricular premature complexes, status post implantable loop recorder, status post endovascular surgery due to aortic dissection, and palpitations, finding that there was no evidence of an in-service injury or disease related to these conditions.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the Veteran's claim for service connection for obstructive sleep apnea due to PTSD and/or heart conditions, including a need for additional opinions on whether these conditions have caused or aggravated his obstructive sleep apnea.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for a new VA examination to determine the nature and etiology of the Veteran's supraventricular tachycardia, including considering all applicable toxic exposure risk activities. The VA must also obtain and associate with the claims file a copy of the May 2019 audiogram.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.