The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient development of evidence regarding service connection for cause of death from asbestos exposure, including a need for a VA opinion on the relationship between in-service throat symptomatology and post-service cancer.
The deciding factor: The decision is based on the need for further development and clarification of the Veteran's claim, particularly regarding the etiology of his laryngeal cancer and metastatic lung cancer.
- Claimed conditions
- laryngeal cancer, metastatic lung cancer
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 23, 2010
- Citation
- 1027732
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1027732.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for laryngeal cancer and a heart disability to the agency of original jurisdiction for further development.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for laryngeal cancer, finding that there is no evidence linking the condition to his military service or exposure to contaminated water at Camp Lejeune.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the service connection claims for various cancers and eye conditions due to an alleged failure to properly investigate toxic exposures during service, including at Fort Wainwright.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for laryngeal cancer to conduct further development, including verifying in-service exposures and scheduling a TERA examination.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.