The Veteran's claims for earlier effective dates for the grants of a compensable rating for impaired hearing and service connection for tinnitus have been denied as there is no evidence that an increase in severity occurred prior to July 21, 2005 or that he filed a claim for service connection for tinnitus prior to this date.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's claims are based on the failure of earlier effective dates due to lack of evidence of increased disability and no previous filing of a claim for service connection for tinnitus.
- Claimed conditions
- Impaired hearing
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 28, 2010
- Citation
- 1028084
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1028084.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's unauthorized medical expenses incurred at a private hospital on September 9, 2015 are granted as the treatment was rendered in a medical emergency of such nature that delay would have been hazardous to life or health and VA facilities were not feasibly available.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for a 10 percent rating for service-connected impaired hearing was denied.,The Veteran's appeal for a higher rating for his service-connected hearing loss from November 20, 2007, was also denied.
- Denied
The Veteran died in March 2008 and the death certificate lists the cause of death as cardiac arrest. The appellant filed a claim for VA burial benefits, but the Board found that the criteria for payment of such benefits were not met due to the Veteran's non-service-connected nature of his death.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's income exceeds the maximum annual pension limit, and his need for aid and attendance is recognized. The case is being remanded to recalculate his income based on potential deductions from the Jefferson Retirement Home.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.