The Board has determined that the Veteran's service-connected bilateral inguinal hernia repair warrants a 10 percent rating, effective October 1, 2005. Additionally, a separate 10 percent rating is assigned for surgical scarring of the scrotum.
The deciding factor: The medical evidence shows recurrent and readily reducible postoperative inguinal hernia residuals that more nearly approximate the criteria for a 10 percent rating under Diagnostic Code 7338. The Veteran's bilateral five cm. diagonal inguinal hernia repair scars are also shown to be painful on examination, warranting a separate 10 percent rating under Diagnostic Code 7804.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral inguinal hernia repair, surgical scarring of the scrotum
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- July 29, 2010
- Citation
- 1028291
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1028291.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board allowed the benefit or issue identified in this decision. Review the original order: other issues in the same appeal may have a different outcome, and this decision does not predict another claim.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Partly granted
The Board denied a compensable evaluation for psoriasis and bilateral inguinal hernia repair, but granted a 10 percent evaluation for right ear hearing loss effective July 19, 2021.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's need for regular aid and attendance is due to service-connected disabilities, leading to the grant of SMC based on the need for aid and attendance. The issue of entitlement to SMC by reason of being housebound is dismissed as moot.
- Whole decision: Denied
The veteran's claim for special monthly pension based on the need for regular aid and attendance or being housebound was denied as he does not meet the criteria for either.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the appellant's claim for increased DIC under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1311 based on hypothetical entitlement to a total disability rating for a continuous period of at least 8 years prior to death, finding that the veteran had never been rated as 100% disabling during his lifetime and denying the claim.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.