The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient development of the claim for service connection for cause of death, including a dose estimate from the Under Secretary for Health and review by the Under Secretary for Benefits.
The deciding factor: Development is required under 38 C.F.R. § 3.311(a)(2)(iii) due to exposure to ionizing radiation during service.
- Claimed conditions
- paraneoplastic syndrome, metastatic carcinoma, metastatic to the nodes and biliary system
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 30, 2010
- Citation
- 1028591
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1028591.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected lung cancer results in loss of use of the upper extremities, meeting the criteria for financial assistance in purchasing an automobile or other conveyance.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is remanded due to insufficient medical evidence regarding the loss of use of a hand or foot resulting from his service-connected paraneoplastic syndrome. Further development, including an addendum opinion, is required.
- Denied
The Veteran's cause of death was attributed to paraneoplastic syndrome and poorly differentiated carcinoma, metastatic to the nodes and biliary system. The Board found that these conditions were not related to his service or exposure to ionizing radiation.
- Denied
The Veteran's cause of death, paraneoplastic syndrome and adenocarcinoma of the throat, was not service-connected as a result of exposure to Agent Orange. The Board found that neither condition had onset during service or within one year after separation from service, nor could it be presumed due to exposure to Agent Orange. Additionally, the service-connected disabilities did not cause or contribute to the Veteran's death.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.