The Board found that the Veteran did not have any current disabilities related to his service, and thus denied his claims for service connection.
The deciding factor: There was no evidence of a right hand injury or blood poisoning during service, and there is insufficient medical evidence linking these conditions to service.
- Claimed conditions
- injury to the right hand, blood poisoning, skin condition with scars
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 30, 2010
- Citation
- 1028610
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1028610.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for blood poisoning, back disability, left shin stress fracture, right shin stress fracture, psychiatric disability, and respiratory disability due to lack of current diagnoses. The claims are being remanded for further development.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claim for additional development due to new information provided by the Veteran, including medical articles supporting his claims. An independent medical opinion is needed from a non-VA specialist in orthopedics.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for vein problems, blood poisoning, feet blisters, and giant cell bone tumor of the right radius are denied as there is no current diagnosis associated with these conditions during the appeal period.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder (including major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder) is remanded due to the interrelated nature of the issues.
- Granted
The Veteran's tinnitus began in service and has continued to the present.,Bilateral hearing loss manifested more than one year after separation from service and is not shown to be causally or etiologically related to an in-service event, injury or disease.,The preponderance of the evidence is against finding that the Veteran currently has any current underlying disability or chronic residuals from a leech removed from his left ear in service. The Veteran's current hearing loss and tinnitus are not connected to his time in service.,The preponderance of the evidence is against finding that the Veteran currently has blood poisoning and had blood poisoning in service.,Emphysema manifested more than one year after separation and is not shown to be causally or etiologically related to an in-service event, injury or disease.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.