Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran is seeking increased ratings for his service-connected disabilities and seeks to establish service connection for other conditions.,The Veteran is also seeking a compensable rating for recurrent otitis externa-media.,The Veteran is seeking an increased rating in excess of 10 percent for chronic sinusitis with a history of allergic rhinitis.,The Veteran is seeking service connection for bronchial asthma, pseudofolliculitis barbae, lupus erythematous of the face, and Lyme disease.,The Veteran is also seeking service connection for depression.,The Veteran seeks service connection for pseudofolliculitis barbae, lupus erythematous of the face, and Lyme disease.,The Veteran seeks service connection for depression.

The deciding factor: The RO/AMC needs to ascertain if the Veteran has received any VA, non-VA, or other medical treatment for his disabilities that is not evidenced by the current record. They also need to ensure that all necessary examinations are conducted and completed in full.,The RO/AMC needs to review the claims file and ensure that all of the above development actions have been conducted and completed in full. If any development is incomplete, appropriate corrective action must be implemented.,The RO/AMC should re-adjudicate the Veteran's claims in light of all of the evidence of record. If the benefit sought on appeal remains denied, a supplemental statement of the case (SSOC) must be provided to the Veteran and his representative.,The Veteran needs to provide updated authorizations for the release of medical records from Tri-Care Medical and the Clinton Medical Center.

Claimed conditions
degenerative arthritis of the spine, recurrent otitis externa-media, chronic sinusitis with a history of allergic rhinitis, pseudofolliculitis barbae, lupus erythematous of the face, Lyme disease, depression
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
August 4, 2010
Citation
1029152

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1029152.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.