The Veteran's claims for increased ratings for residuals of frostbite in all four extremities were denied as the evidence did not meet the criteria for a higher rating under Diagnostic Code 7122.
The deciding factor: The medical evidence showed that the Veteran had persistent coldness, atrophic skin changes, and thin skin with absence of hair on his toes. He also had some limitation of range of motion in his ankles due to weakness but no pain or other symptoms. The X-rays revealed osteoarthritic changes without loss of tissue or digits.
- Claimed conditions
- Residuals of Frostbite
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 10%
- Decision date
- August 19, 2010
- Citation
- 1031194
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1031194.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for the award of a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) due to service-connected PTSD and frostbite residuals was denied by the Board. The TDIU was granted effective October 13, 2011, but the Veteran sought an earlier effective date.
- Denied
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have a bilateral knee, leg, or hip disorder, nor does he have residuals of frostbite. The skin disorder claim is also denied as there is no evidence to support its existence during service.
- Granted
The Board finds that it is at least as likely as not that PTSD and residuals of frostbite are related to service, granting the veteran's claims for these conditions.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.