The Veteran's cervical spine disability has been objectively shown to be manifested by no more than degenerative disc disease, a cervical spine range of motion of forward flexion of 0 to 45 degrees with pain beyond 35 degrees, extension of 0 to 45 degrees, right lateral flexion of 0 to 45 degrees with pain beyond 35 degrees, left lateral flexion of 0 to 45 degrees, right lateral rotation of 0 to 80 degrees with pain beyond 70 degrees, and left lateral flexion of 0 to 80 degrees; normal sensation around the neck and shoulders; normal upper extremity muscle strength, and no radiculopathy. As such, an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent is not warranted for the Veteran's cervical spine degenerative disc disease at any time during the pendency of this appeal.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's cervical spine disability has been objectively shown to be manifested by no more than degenerative disc disease, a cervical spine range of motion of forward flexion of 0 to 45 degrees with pain beyond 35 degrees, extension of 0 to 45 degrees, right lateral flexion of 0 to 45 degrees with pain beyond 35 degrees, left lateral flexion of 0 to 45 degrees, right lateral rotation of 0 to 80 degrees with pain beyond 70 degrees, and left lateral flexion of 0 to 80 degrees; normal sensation around the neck and shoulders; normal upper extremity muscle strength, and no radiculopathy. These findings do not meet the criteria for an evaluation in excess of 10 percent under the provisions of Diagnostic Code 5243.
- Claimed conditions
- cervical spine degenerative disc disease
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 10%
- Decision date
- August 27, 2010
- Citation
- 1032356
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1032356.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for a higher rating in excess of the current ratings for various musculoskeletal conditions.
- Granted
The Board granted service connection for multiple musculoskeletal conditions and a psychiatric condition, all of which were determined to be caused by an in-service injury.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings and remanded several service connection claims.
- Partly granted
The Board denied increased disability evaluations for several conditions, dismissed claims for others, and remanded two issues for further development.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.