The Veteran incurred unauthorized medical expenses for treatment at Sacred Heart Hospital from September 7, 2007 through September 28, 2007. The VA denied payment because VA facilities were feasibly available to provide care and the Veteran could have been safely transferred to a VA facility prior to September 7, 2007.
The deciding factor: The VA determined that VA facilities were feasibly available to provide care and the Veteran could have been safely transferred to a VA facility prior to September 7, 2007.
- Claimed conditions
- psychiatric problems, residuals of fractures of left arm and leg
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 3, 2010
- Citation
- 1033321
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1033321.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for hypertension, finding that the Veteran did not have a chronic disease in service or within the initial post-service year. The claim was based on his statements and testimony about having symptoms of nosebleeds and passing out during service which he believed were related to hypertension.,The Board also denied compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for additional disability due to a VA lumbar myelogram in October 1971, concluding that the Veteran's pre-existing back condition was aggravated by his work-related injuries and not by the procedure.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 is denied as the medical care in question was not rendered by VA or during active military service.
- Denied
The Board denied reopening the claim as to whether the appellant was permanently incapable of self-support due to disability prior to age 18 for the purpose of helpless child benefits, finding that new and material evidence had not been submitted.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the character of the appellant's discharge is not a bar to VA compensation benefits based on disability incurred in or aggravated by his period of service from July 1989 to May 1994. The veteran's claims for service connection are remanded for further development and consideration.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.