The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining medical records and scheduling a VA examination to determine if the Veteran's current nasal disability is related to his service.
The deciding factor: VA failed to provide sufficient reasons and bases for not providing the Veteran with a medical examination as required by law.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of a nasal injury
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 10, 2010
- Citation
- 1034060
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1034060.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for residuals of a nasal injury, including deviated septum and/or nasal fracture, finding that the Veteran's current condition is related to his in-service injury.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for pulmonary tuberculosis, an initial compensable rating for residuals of a nasal injury, and basic eligibility for non-service-connected disability pension benefits. The issues were characterized as stated on the title page.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining medical records and a VA examination. The issue of evaluating his nasal injury remains in appellate status.
- Granted
The Board has reopened the veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of a nasal injury and found that new evidence supports this reopening. However, the Board denied the claim as there is no competent medical evidence linking the current condition to service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.