The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection were denied. The initial noncompensable disability rating for residuals of a gunshot wound to the right thigh was upheld, as were the decisions regarding cold weather injury residuals and bilateral knee degenerative joint disease.
The deciding factor: The VA examinations did not reveal any new or worsening conditions that would warrant higher ratings, and service connection could not be established due to lack of evidence linking current disabilities to service.
- Claimed conditions
- Residuals of a gunshot wound to the right thigh affecting Muscle Group XV and XVIII, Degenerative joint disease of the bilateral knees
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 20, 2010
- Citation
- 1035301
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1035301.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for automobile and adaptive equipment or for adaptive equipment only due to lack of evidence showing loss or permanent loss of use of one or both feet, hands, vision impairment, or ankylosis of knees or hips resulting from service-connected disabilities.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for degenerative joint disease of the bilateral knees as a residual of right femur and left tibia fractures, finding that the Veteran's pre-existing condition was not aggravated by service.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for a 60 percent rating for bladder dysfunction is denied as the earliest date entitlement became factually ascertainable was December 22, 2009. The Veteran's claim for TDIU prior to December 22, 2009 is also denied due to his ability to secure and follow substantially gainful employment.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for an addendum opinion regarding whether the Veteran's service-connected left foot pes planus and/or left ankle disability aggravated his obesity, which may have contributed to his bilateral knee degenerative joint disease.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.