The VA cholecystectomy in August 2000 and the stent placement in February 2001 caused bile duct obstruction, which is a foreseeable consequence of biliary stenting. However, the Veteran did not provide informed consent prior to the stent placement, constituting negligence on VA's part.
The deciding factor: VA's failure to obtain informed consent prior to the stent placement in February 2001 caused the bile duct obstruction and constitutes negligence.
- Claimed conditions
- Cholecystectomy (removal of gall bladder), Bile duct obstruction, Chronic pancreatitis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 3, 2010
- Citation
- 1041264
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1041264.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for a more detailed examination to assess the current severity of the right index finger amputation residuals and to determine if there is a relationship between chronic pancreatitis and military service.
- Granted
The Veteran's service connection claim for an acquired psychiatric disability, including bipolar disorder and PTSD, chronic pancreatitis, gout (secondary to chronic pancreatitis), and GERD has been granted. The Board found that the preponderance of evidence supports a finding that the Veteran is currently diagnosed with bipolar II disorder which is related to his military service.
- Granted
The Veteran's postoperative duodenal ulcer with GERD and chronic pancreatitis was rated at 20 percent from April 6, 2004 to December 31, 2005. After that period, the rating remained at 20 percent.
- Denied
The Veteran's postoperative duodenal ulcer with GERD and chronic pancreatitis did not result in impairment of health manifested by anemia and weight loss or recurrent incapacitating episodes averaging 10 days or more in duration at least four or more times a year, thus the claim for increased rating was denied.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.