Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Board has determined that there is insufficient evidence to support the Veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II, due to herbicide exposure. The case is being remanded for further development.

The deciding factor: There are no records indicating the Veteran was exposed to herbicides while in Vietnam and his claims file does not contain any corroborating evidence of such exposure.

Claimed conditions
diabetes mellitus, type II
How they argued it
Reopened with new and material evidence
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
November 5, 2010
Citation
1041690

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1041690.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.