The Veteran's initial ratings for his scars have been granted, with the most recent rating decision increasing the rating to 30 percent effective November 19, 2008. The Veteran is satisfied with this rating and has withdrawn his appeal regarding the earlier date of service connection.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner found that the scar on the left medial upper leg was not tender or painful and did not warrant a higher rating based on its pain. However, other scars were noted to be painful and tender, leading to an increased rating for five scars overall.
- Claimed conditions
- Posttraumatic, post-surgical S-shaped scar of the medial aspect of the left lower extremity, Posttraumatic, post-surgical painful lateral left lower extremity scars (formerly posttraumatic, post-surgical painful lateral left lower extremity scars), Posttraumatic, post-surgical painful left medial upper leg scar, Two gluteal area left leg semi-lateral scars, Left foot lateral scar (formerly posttraumatic, post-surgical painful lateral left lower extremity scar)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 30%
- Decision date
- November 15, 2010
- Citation
- 1042748
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1042748.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected musculoligamentous strain, right knee, is currently rated at 10 percent and the Board finds that a higher rating is not warranted.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for service connection for PTSD is granted as the evidence shows a current diagnosis of PTSD, an in-service stressor, and a medical link between the two.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.