The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient information regarding the Veteran's exposure to ionizing radiation. The Veteran is seeking service connection for follicular lymphoma, which he claims developed as a result of his handling of nuclear artillery shells in Korea and exposure to chemicals.
The deciding factor: Insufficient evidence was provided regarding the Veteran's exposure to ionizing radiation during service.
- Claimed conditions
- follicular lymphoma
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 13, 2010
- Citation
- 1046471
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1046471.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for service connection of follicular lymphoma was denied as the evidence did not show that he filed a claim before August 2015, which became final. The current effective date is January 13, 2024.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for large B-cell lymphoma, finding that the Veteran's symptoms during military service are consistent with his diagnosis and that exposure to burn pits increases the risk of developing cancer. The effective date is not specified as it relates to a presumption under the PACT Act.
- Partly granted
The Veteran's claims for service connection for insomnia disorder, anxiety disorder, and follicular lymphoma have been readjudicated due to the submission of new and relevant evidence.,However, the claims for service connection for an anxiety disorder (secondary to tinnitus), tension headaches (secondary to kidney neoplasm), and hiatal hernia (secondary to benign neoplasm) are being remanded as there is insufficient medical opinion regarding their etiology.
- Dismissed
The Veteran requested to withdraw his appeal regarding the proposed reduction of his follicular lymphoma disability rating from 100% to noncompensable. The Board dismissed the appeal as valid.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.