The Veteran's appeal is being remanded to the RO for additional development, including obtaining medical records and scheduling VA examinations. The case will be readjudicated after all requested information and evidence are received.
The deciding factor: The decision cannot be finalized without further examination of the Veteran's current level of industrial inadaptability caused by his service-connected disabilities.
- Claimed conditions
- orthopedic disabilities, cardiovascular disabilities
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 27, 2010
- Citation
- 1047939
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1047939.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the case to obtain an adequate medical opinion regarding the nature and etiology of the Veteran's heart disabilities, including whether they are related to service or any service-connected disability.
- Granted
The Veteran's SMC P-2 award is restored effective January 31, 2020. The rating decision proposing a reduction in his SMC was found to have made CUE and thus the restoration of his SMC P-2 award is granted.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) due to his failure to provide updated employment information, specifically by submitting a VA Form 21-8940. The evidence showed that he had service-connected disabilities but did not meet the criteria for TDIU as defined in the regulations.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for additional development, including obtaining new VA opinions and obtaining treatment records from a private facility. The Veteran's chronic fatigue syndrome is being evaluated in light of these new pieces of evidence.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.