The Board found that there is no evidence of a current disability due to the claimed bilateral ankle injuries and denied service connection for this condition.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's service treatment records show only one incident of right ankle injury during active service, which resolved without residual disability. The Veteran does not currently experience any symptoms related to his claimed bilateral ankle injuries.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral ankle injuries
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- January 10, 2011
- Citation
- 1100894
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1100894.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's request for an earlier effective date of November 13, 2020, for his grant of TDIU. The Board found that the proper effective date was August 20, 2021, based on the date of receipt of the claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus, back strain, bilateral knee injuries, and bilateral ankle injuries due to new evidence of worsening symptoms.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board found that the veteran's claimed conditions were not incurred or aggravated by service, except for his skin disorder which was caused by active military service. The left knee, right great toe, and right shoulder disabilities are presumed to have occurred in service due to Agent Orange exposure.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board found no evidence to support the veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral ankle injuries and residuals of a left groin injury, concluding that his current symptoms are not related to any disease or injury incurred during active military service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.