The Veteran's appeal is being remanded to obtain additional VA treatment records and to schedule a VA examination for his Huntington's disease.
The deciding factor: The Veteran has not provided sufficient evidence or argument to substantiate the claims, necessitating further development of the record.
- Claimed conditions
- Huntington's disease
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- January 21, 2011
- Citation
- 1102478
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1102478.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's death was not caused by a service-connected disability, and the Appellant has not received payment for accrued benefits related to the grant of service connection for hearing loss and tinnitus.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board has denied service connection for Huntington's disease, headaches claimed as secondary to PTSD, and sleep apnea claimed as secondary to PTSD. The evidence does not support a finding that these conditions began during service or are otherwise related to an in-service injury, event, or disease.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for Huntington's disease and basal cell carcinoma, finding no current diagnosis of Huntington's disease and insufficient evidence linking the skin cancer to in-service herbicide exposure.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases due to insufficient evidence regarding whether Huntington's disease, a service-connected condition, caused or aggravated another disability. The TDIU claim is also being remanded as it may be impacted by the neuropsychological disability determination.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.