The Veteran developed ototoxicity and vestibulopathy as a result of VA treatment for bacteremia/septic arthritis in April 2004. The Board found that the proximate cause was VA's failure to monitor Gentamicin levels, resulting in the development of these conditions.
The deciding factor: VA treatment resulted in ototoxicity and vestibulopathy due to the use of high-dose Gentamicin for pseudomonas endocarditis, which was necessary but not without risk. The Veteran's condition is considered a result of VA care as it was reasonably foreseeable given the nature of the treatment.
- Claimed conditions
- ototoxicity, vestibulopathy
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 26, 2011
- Citation
- 1103423
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1103423.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected conditions, including major depressive disorder and bilateral plantar fasciitis, have prevented him from securing and following gainful employment since January 5, 2021.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for the Veteran's diagnosed vertigo, finding that it is at least as likely as not related to his military service. The issue of an initial rating in excess of 30 percent for asbestosis remains pending and must be remanded.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for a new VA examination to determine the etiology of any current diagnosed vestibular disorder, including Meniere's disease and related conditions. The Veteran must be advised of the importance of reporting to the scheduled VA examination.
- Denied
The Board found that the Veteran's vertigo did not become chronic in service and there was no continuity of symptomatology between service and the present. The Board also noted conflicting medical opinions regarding whether the vertigo is related to service, with one examiner attributing it to noise exposure during service and another indicating it is unrelated to service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.