The Board has remanded the case for clarification of the nature and severity of the Veteran's current skin disability, including whether neurodermatitis is included in the grant of service connection. The claims for higher ratings for tinea cruris will also be readjudicated, and a SOC on the timeliness issue will be issued.
The deciding factor: The case was remanded due to unclear nature of the Veteran's current skin disability and the need for clarification regarding whether neurodermatitis is included in the grant of service connection.
- Claimed conditions
- tinea cruris, neurodermatitis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 3, 2011
- Citation
- 1104448
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1104448.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's tinea cruris was rated as noncompensable (0 percent) since the July 3, 2024 service-connection effective date. The VA examiner found that the condition affected less than 5% of his total body area and zero percent of exposed areas, thus not meeting the criteria for a compensable rating.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for service connection for PTSD has been withdrawn by the appellant.,Service connection for pain secondary to a service-connected condition is denied. The Veteran does not have a current disability of pain that is related to service or a service-connected condition he is not currently compensated for.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for bilateral onychomycosis in the great toenails and tinea cruris due to service, as the VA examiner is needed to provide an opinion regarding whether these conditions are related to service. The Veteran's theories of direct service connection will be considered.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's skin condition, including tinea versicolor and tinea cruris, is presumed to have existed prior to service. The Board has determined that there was a duty to assist error in not obtaining a VA medical opinion considering the relevant evidence of record, particularly the STRs documenting treatment for tinea cruris during service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.