Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's claim for service connection for sleep apnea secondary to service-connected diabetes mellitus and PTSD is remanded.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for hypertension, to include as secondary to service-connected diabetes mellitus and PTSD is remanded.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for a skin condition (presumptive due to herbicide exposure) is remanded.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for a right ankle disability is remanded.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for a left ankle disability is remanded.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for hair loss, to include as due to herbicide exposure is remanded.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for a peptic ulcer with gastrointestinal bleeding is remanded.

The deciding factor: There are no current diagnoses of the claimed conditions and there is insufficient evidence to establish continuity of symptoms since service.,There are no current diagnoses of the claimed conditions and there is insufficient evidence to establish continuity of symptoms since service.,The Veteran has a history of skin rash in service, but there is no current diagnosis or evidence of a current disability related to herbicide exposure.,There is no current diagnosis of the right ankle disability and there is insufficient evidence to establish continuity of symptoms since service.,There is no current diagnosis of the left ankle disability and there is insufficient evidence to establish continuity of symptoms since service.,The Veteran has provided credible testimony that he has suffered from a skin condition continuously since service, but there is no current diagnosis or evidence of a current disability related to herbicide exposure.,There are no current diagnoses of the claimed conditions and there is insufficient evidence to establish continuity of symptoms since service.

Claimed conditions
sleep apnea, hypertension, a skin condition (presumptive due to herbicide exposure), right ankle disability, left ankle disability, hair loss (not service-connected as not a presumptive disability)
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
February 4, 2011
Citation
1104540

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1104540.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.