Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Denied

The Veteran's May 2007 heart attack, stent placement, and resulting emotional trauma were not caused by or aggravated by VA's discontinuation of Plavix in April 2007. The Board found no evidence of negligence on the part of VA.

The deciding factor: VA did not exhibit carelessness, negligence, lack of proper skill, error in judgment, or similar instance of fault in providing the Veteran with his Plavix prescription and subsequent medical treatment.

Claimed conditions
Heart attack, Stent placement, Emotional trauma
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
February 14, 2011
Citation
1106001

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1106001.

What this means for you

A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.