The Board found no evidence of a link between the Veteran's current genitourinary disorders and his service, including any in-service injuries. The Veteran's lay assertions regarding continuity of symptoms were not credible due to inconsistent statements documented in the medical records.
The deciding factor: There is strong medical evidence against a link between the Veteran's current genitourinary disorders and his treatment during service.
- Claimed conditions
- left epididymitis, benign prostatic hypertrophy, benign neoplasm of the prostate, urinary hesitancy, dribbling, frequency, urgency, anuresis, left testicle tenderness
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 23, 2011
- Citation
- 1107311
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1107311.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's service connection claims for various conditions, including adjustment disorder, benign skin lesions, actinic keratosis, poikiloderma, porokeratosis, Parkinson's disease, benign prostatic hypertrophy, hypertension, increased urinary frequency, diverticulosis, duodenal ulcer, and bilateral cataracts are all granted due to exposure to herbicide agents, mustard gas, and ionizing radiation during service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to conflicting evidence regarding the nature of the Veteran's prostate condition and a need for further examination.
- Granted
The Veteran is granted SMC at the enhanced R-1 rate due to his need for regular assistance with activities of daily living and a total disability rating, including service-connected conditions such as Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and PTSD.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for benign prostatic hypertrophy is denied as there is no evidence of a nexus between the condition and his military service, including exposure to toxic environmental toxins.,The Veteran's claim for an acquired psychiatric disorder is also denied. The Board found that the claimed condition was not incurred in or caused by service, and does not meet the secondary service connection criteria.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.