The Board has determined that the Veteran's bilateral hand and finger disabilities, as well as his bilateral wrist disabilities, are not service-connected due to lack of evidence showing a nexus between these conditions and his military service.
The deciding factor: The medical opinions provided by VA examiners did not support a finding that the Veteran's current hand and wrist disabilities were incurred in or aggravated by his military service.
- Claimed conditions
- Bilateral Hand and Finger Disability, Bilateral Wrist Disability
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 25, 2011
- Citation
- 1107711
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1107711.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for a higher rating for PTSD, TDIU based on PTSD, and service connection for various disabilities, except for tinnitus which was granted.
- Partly granted
The Veteran's mood disorder with depressive features is granted a 100% rating effective October 2, 2019. Basic eligibility for Dependent's Educational Assistance (DEA) is also granted effective that date. The Board has remanded the issues of service connection for a bilateral wrist disability secondary to hepatitis C, a rating in excess of 20 percent for hepatitis C, and TDIU.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the claims for right elbow disability, bilateral foot disability, and bilateral wrist disability due to inadequate VA medical opinions. The AOJ must obtain new opinions from suitably qualified clinicians to address the nature and etiology of these disabilities.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for various conditions due to new and material evidence having been received. The claims are now pending for further examination and opinion.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.