The Veteran's claim for residuals of a left great toe injury resulting from a mortar attack in Vietnam was denied as there is no evidence of such an injury or any residuals thereof during service.
The deciding factor: There is no credible evidence to support the Veteran's reported mortar attack and subsequent injuries, nor are there current clinical diagnoses of residuals of a claimed left great toe injury.
- Claimed conditions
- chronically ingrown toenail of the left great toe with ongoing onychomycosis and a history of infection resulting in IP joint arthritis, left great toe injury
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 10, 2011
- Citation
- 1109473
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1109473.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Partly granted
The Veteran's initial claim for increased ratings for left foot degenerative arthritis was denied. The appeal is mixed, with some issues granted and others not.
- Granted
The Veteran's left foot disability, characterized by severe hallux valgus with degenerative arthritis and hammertoes, is rated at 30 percent since June 10, 2022.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's left foot condition and left great toe injury are being remanded for further evaluation as the current opinions do not address her chronic left foot pain since service separation.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for hepatitis, left great toe injury, abrasions and lacerations to fingers of the left hand, left hand cold weather injury, lower back disability, and colonitis due to lack of evidence linking these conditions to active duty service.,Service connection was not granted as the appellant's hepatitis is attributed to his own willful misconduct involving drug use. The other conditions were found not to be related to active duty service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.