The Veteran's current legal blindness was not caused by or related to his service, including any exposure during a blizzard in Alaska. The VA examiner found the condition to be age-related and unrelated to service.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner determined that the Veteran's bilateral blindness is due to an age-related disease (dry macular degeneration) and was not caused by or related to his reported in-service exposure to a blizzard.
- Claimed conditions
- Legal Blindness
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 10, 2011
- Citation
- 1109602
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1109602.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for HIV and associated immune disorder, legal blindness secondary to HIV, and acquired mental disorder secondary to HIV. The evidence did not support a finding that these conditions had onset in active service or were otherwise causally related.,The Board found no persuasive evidence linking the Veteran's current diagnoses of HIV, legal blindness, and acquired mental disorders to his active service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for HIV, legal blindness secondary to HIV, and an acquired mental disorder (including PTSD and depression) secondary to HIV due to additional development being required. The Veteran submitted medical literature suggesting he may have been HIV positive prior to separation from active service.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected PTSD requires him to be in need of aid and attendance, which is granted as part of his SMC claim.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.