The Board found no evidence of a chronic nasal disability or bleeding ears that were incurred during service. The Veteran's pre-existing conditions, including his deviated septum and laceration of the ear canal, did not result in a chronic condition from an injury sustained during service.
The deciding factor: There is no medical evidence showing a chronic nasal disability or bleeding ears resulting from injuries sustained during service.
- Claimed conditions
- Nasal Disability, Bleeding Ears
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 16, 2011
- Citation
- 1110557
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1110557.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for an initial compensable disability rating for bilateral hearing loss was denied as the evidence did not show a current disability.,Service connection for headaches and bleeding ears were both denied because there is no persuasive evidence of current disabilities.,No additional development was needed due to lack of service connection claims.
- Denied
The Board has determined that the Veteran's respiratory disorder, including a nasal disability, is not service-connected because there is clear and unmistakable evidence that the injury pre-existed service and was not aggravated by service.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's nasal disability warrants a 10 percent rating, effective January 26, 2010.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to ambiguity in the circumstances surrounding the VA examination of October 1999. The veteran's claim for service connection for PTSD will be reviewed again with a new examination by two different psychiatrists.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.