Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
GrantedPACT Act

The Veteran's request for an increased evaluation for his right knee disability is granted.,A separate evaluation for the scar associated with his right knee disability is denied.,An evaluation in excess of 50 percent for PTSD from October 13, 2007 is granted.,An evaluation in excess of 70 percent for PTSD from June 12, 2008 is granted.,The Veteran's claim for a compensable evaluation for his bilateral hearing loss is denied.,Service connection for the Veteran's bleeding ulcer is granted as secondary to service-connected PTSD.,Service connection for sleep apnea with CPAP is granted as secondary to service-connected PTSD.,Service connection for psoriasis is granted as secondary to service-connected PTSD.,Service connection for erectile dysfunction is granted as secondary to service-connected PTSD.,The Veteran's heart disorder, presumed due to herbicide exposure, is granted.

The deciding factor: The Veteran has a right knee disability that warrants an increased evaluation.,There was no evidence of a separate scar associated with the Veteran's right knee disability.,PTSD symptoms have worsened and warrant an evaluation in excess of 50 percent from October 13, 2007.,PTSD symptoms have worsened and warrant an evaluation in excess of 70 percent from June 12, 2008.,The Veteran's hearing loss disability does not meet the criteria for a compensable evaluation.,Service connection is granted as the Veteran has evidence that his ulcer was caused by PTSD.,Service connection is granted as the Veteran has evidence that his sleep apnea with CPAP was caused by PTSD.,Service connection is granted as the Veteran has evidence that his psoriasis was caused by PTSD.,Service connection is granted as the Veteran has evidence that his erectile dysfunction was caused by PTSD.,The heart disorder, presumed due to herbicide exposure, is granted.

Claimed conditions
Right Knee Disability, Bleeding Ulcer, Sleep Apnea with CPAP, Psoriasis, Erectile Dysfunction
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
April 1, 2011
Citation
1112954

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1112954.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.