The Veteran's claims for increased ratings for right ankle and lumbosacral spine disabilities were denied. The VA examinations did not support higher ratings based on the severity of his symptoms.
The deciding factor: The VA examinations indicated that the Veteran's range of motion was within the criteria for a 30 percent rating, with no additional limitation due to pain or other DeLuca factors.
- Claimed conditions
- Degenerative Joint Disease (DJD) of the right ankle, Lumbosacral strain with DJD
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 30%
- Decision date
- April 15, 2011
- Citation
- 1114778
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1114778.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities rendered him unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation for the entire appeal period prior to January 29, 2010. The Board granted a TDIU on an extra-schedular basis.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for increased ratings for right ankle DJD and left knee osteoarthritis due to insufficient evidence in the record. The Veteran's current ratings of 10 percent are maintained.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for service connection for degenerative joint disease (DJD) of the right ankle has been reopened due to new and material evidence. The case is being remanded for further evaluation.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is for a higher rating for his right ankle DJD, currently rated at 10 percent. The Board finds that the evidence does not support a higher rating.,The Veteran also appeals for an earlier effective date for the 10 percent rating he received in March 2015.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.