The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete records and need for additional medical opinions.
The deciding factor: Incomplete records, including those from Fort Knox Army Hospital and Omaha VA Medical Center, necessitate further investigation. Additional medical opinions are needed regarding the Veteran's in-service symptoms and their relation to his current condition.
- Claimed conditions
- cervical spine disability with radiculopathy
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 22, 2011
- Citation
- 1115874
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1115874.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for TDIU as his service-connected disabilities do not prevent him from securing and maintaining employment, despite significant physical and mental impairments.
- Dismissed
The Veteran withdrew her appeal on the issues of service connection for a cervical spine disability with radiculopathy, sinusitis, hyperhidrosis, and muscle spasms. As a result, these issues are dismissed.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded several issues on appeal, including service connection claims for various disabilities and an initial rating for fibromyalgia. The effective date of service connection for fibromyalgia is granted as May 13, 2010.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection and increased evaluation of his right knee disability. The Veteran appealed this decision to the Court, which vacated part of it but did not address whether new and material evidence had been received.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.