The Board has remanded the case for additional medical opinion and to obtain complete treatment records from Coastal Urology Associates. The Veteran seeks service connection for a prostate disorder, including chronic prostatitis status post transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and a disorder causing human seminal plasma hypersensitivity in his spouse.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the medical evidence is insufficient to decide this case due to conflicting lay evidence and inconsistent testimony from the Veteran. The remand includes obtaining complete treatment records, scheduling an examination by a urologist, and providing additional medical opinion based on review of the claims folder and pertinent medical treatise information.
- Claimed conditions
- prostate disorder
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- Gulf War
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- May 4, 2011
- Citation
- 1117142
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1117142.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has ordered a medical examination to clarify the current diagnosis of prostate disorder and determine if it is related to service, including exposure to herbicides during the Vietnam War Era.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions have been remanded due to the need for additional medical opinions. The effective date for tinea unguium remains denied, and the other issues are pending further review.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided that the Veteran's hypertension, prostate disorder, and sleep apnea are secondary to his service-connected PTSD. However, due to a duty to assist error, the case is being remanded for further evaluation.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection due to new and relevant evidence received since previous decisions. The Veteran's claims are related to exposure in Vietnam, but VA has not conceded herbicide agent exposure.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.