The Board found that the RO's decision to sever service connection for vaginitis was proper due to clear and unmistakable error in granting service connection based on mis-identified pre-service treatment records. The Veteran's condition existed prior to and at entrance into service, but no aggravation beyond normal progression during or as a result of service was found.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner stated that the Veteran's chronic vaginitis was not aggravated by her active duty service.
- Claimed conditions
- Vaginitis, Lichen Sclerosis Et Atrophicus
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- May 10, 2011
- Citation
- 1117952
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1117952.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) due to her service-connected disabilities, finding that she was not unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation consistent with her education and work history.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's urinary frequency is found to be secondary to her service-connected cervical dysplasia s/p cryosurgery.,There is at least approximate balance of evidence regarding whether the Veteran's GERD is caused by her service-connected cervical dysplasia s/p cryosurgery, female sexual arousal disorder (FSAD), and vaginitis.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for a compensable rating for vaginitis prior to October 6, 2020 and a rating greater than 10 percent from that date. The evidence was found to be against the need for continuous treatment of symptoms before October 6, 2020, and against uncontrolled symptoms with continuous treatment after that date.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's claim for SMC based on housebound status or aid and attendance was denied as her service-connected disabilities do not meet the criteria for such benefits.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.