The Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hand and wrist disorders are being remanded due to the need for additional development, including a new examination.
The deciding factor: The decision is based on the need for further medical evaluation to determine if the Veteran's current hand and wrist conditions are related to his military service or any other relevant factors.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral hand disorder, bilateral wrist disorder
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- May 23, 2011
- Citation
- 1119873
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1119873.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims of service connection for bilateral shoulder, elbow, wrist, and hip disorders due to a lack of current diagnoses in the medical records.
- Dismissed
The appeals for service connection for various conditions were dismissed due to the Veteran's untimely and improper submission of a VA Form 10182.
- Partly granted
The Board denied an increased rating for sarcoidosis but granted service connection for a left eye disorder, including glaucoma and a bilateral hand disorder as secondary to sarcoidosis.
- Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for a bilateral hand disorder and right ankle disorder, both diagnosed as crystalline arthropathy. The Board denied an initial rating in excess of 20 percent for diabetes mellitus, type II, but granted a 30 percent rating for diabetic nephropathy. Other claims were either denied or granted ratings within the range requested.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.