Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Partly granted

The Board found that the evidence submitted since the April 2007 rating decision is cumulative and does not provide new or material evidence to reopen the claim of service connection for nasopharyngeal cancer due to Agent Orange exposure.

The deciding factor: The additional evidence provided by the appellant was either previously submitted or duplicative, failing to meet the criteria for 'new and material' evidence as defined by VA regulations.

Claimed conditions
nasopharyngeal cancer
How they argued it
Reopened with new and material evidence
Exposure basis
Agent Orange / herbicides
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
June 14, 2011
Citation
1122823

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1122823.

What this means for you

A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.