The Veteran's recurrent perianal abscesses are rated at a 10 percent disability rating, effective April 1979.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's recurrent perianal abscesses were found to be analogous to a painful scar and assigned a 10 percent rating under the criteria for scars.
- Claimed conditions
- recurrent perianal abscesses
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 10%
- Decision date
- July 6, 2011
- Citation
- 1125405
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1125405.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's recurrent perianal abscesses and hidradenitis suppurativa have been granted a higher disability evaluation of 40 percent, effective September 27, 2002. Additionally, the Veteran has been awarded TDIU from September 27, 2002 through January 6, 2009.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected recurrent perianal abscesses with hidradenitis suppurativa of the groin area is rated at 30 percent, effective from November 8, 1999. The RO found that these conditions are so closely related and resolved reasonable doubt in favor of rating them together.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.