The Board found that the initial diagnosis of dermopathy associated with service-connected diabetes mellitus was clearly erroneous based on subsequent medical evidence, and thus granted the severance of service connection for dermopathy.
The deciding factor: The December 2010 VA examination report concluded that the Veteran's condition diagnosed as bilateral tinea pedis is less likely as not permanently aggravated or a result of any event that occurred during service including diabetes mellitus, and was at least as likely as not a result of post-service contracted tinea pedis.
- Claimed conditions
- dermopathy
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 14, 2011
- Citation
- 1126583
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1126583.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied an initial rating higher than 20 percent for diabetes mellitus, type II, with erectile dysfunction, dermopathy, and retinopathy. The Veteran's diabetes was rated at 20 percent disabling under the old criteria due to restricted diet and oral hypoglycemic agent.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus and related conditions are currently rated at 20 percent, but the Board finds that a higher rating is not warranted. The Veteran’s erectile dysfunction and diabetic dermopathy have been remanded for further examination.
- Denied
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus type II with dermopathy, erectile dysfunction, and cataracts is currently rated at 20 percent. The Board found that the condition does not meet criteria for a higher rating as it does not require regulation of activities.
- Granted
The Board finds that the current neurogenic dermatitis of the upper extremities is due to nervous manifestations likely attributable to service-connected PTSD, and grants service connection for this condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.