The Veteran's claim for service connection for peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral legs, to include as due to herbicide exposure (Agent Orange), is being remanded for additional development.
The deciding factor: The claims file contains medical evidence of a current disorder and credible lay evidence of in-service incurrences. A VA examination is needed to determine whether his currently diagnosed peripheral neuropathy is related to his active military service, including presumed herbicide exposure from his Vietnam-era service and multiple helicopter jumps during service.
- Claimed conditions
- Peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral legs
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- Agent Orange / herbicides
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 27, 2011
- Citation
- 1127946
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1127946.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
Service connection for Type 2 diabetes mellitus (diabetes) is granted. Service connection for diabetic retinopathy, peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral hands, and peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral legs are denied. Entitlement to service connection for hypertension and erectile dysfunction is remanded.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities did not preclude him from securing and following a substantially gainful occupation consistent with his education and work experience.
- Granted
The Board of Veterans' Appeals has granted service connection for PTSD and Mood Disorders, both presumed conditions under the PACT Act.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for diabetes mellitus type II with erectile dysfunction was denied as the evidence did not show that he had been diagnosed and manifested to at least a 10 percent disability rating on or prior to May 8, 2001.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.