The Board has remanded the case due to the need for a VA examination and additional development of the claims, including consideration of both direct service connection and secondary service connection.
The deciding factor: The decision is based on the need for further medical evaluation and development to determine the underlying conditions causing the Veteran's right leg and hip pain and their relationship to his military service.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of right leg injury, residuals of right hip injury
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 5, 2011
- Citation
- 1128961
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1128961.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has denied increased ratings for left hip replacement due to degenerative arthritis and avascular necrosis, residuals of right hip injury, and PTSD. The case is remanded for a medical opinion on the Veteran's mental health symptoms.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for residuals of a right-hand injury, residuals of right hip injury, and residuals of thoracolumbar spine disability. The claimant's right leg radiculopathy is also found to be secondary to his thoracolumbar spine disability.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for the Veteran's residuals of right leg injury, finding that there is no evidence to support a link between his current pain and an in-service motorcycle accident or other incident.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's request to reopen a claim for service connection for tinnitus was denied. Service connection for coronary artery disease (CAD) is also denied, as the evidence does not establish that it is related to his military service or herbicide exposure. The claims of service connection for bilateral shoulder disability and residuals of bilateral leg injury are remanded for further examination. The rating for low back disability and radiculopathy of both lower extremities are also remanded.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.