The Veteran's service-connected disabilities rendered him unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation from April 22, 2002 to April 21, 2003. On and after April 22, 2003, the Veteran was not precluded from securing or following substantially gainful employment as a result of his service-connected disabilities.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner found that the Veteran's service-connected hidradenitis suppurativa caused severe functional impairments which prevented him from working for one year after surgery in 2002, but subsequent examinations showed stable conditions and no current outbreaks or complaints.
- Claimed conditions
- hydradenitis suppurativa with pseudofolliculitis, postoperative scar on the right axilla associated with hydradenitis suppurativa with pseudofolliculitis, postoperative scar involving the groin and anterior buttocks associated with hydradenitis suppurativa with pseudofolliculitis, postoperative scar on the right flank associated with hydradenitis suppurativa with pseudofolliculitis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 60%
- Decision date
- August 18, 2011
- Citation
- 1130753
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1130753.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected skin disabilities rendered him unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation from April 22, 2003. Effective April 21, 2003, the Veteran is no longer unemployable solely due to his service-connected conditions.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is remanded to the RO for further development, including a VA examination and review of his work history. The case will be returned to the Board after these actions are completed.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.