The Veteran's claims for an effective date prior to September 6, 2006 for service connection for syncopal episodes as a residual of head trauma and for a 100 percent evaluation for organic mood disorder and organic amnestic disorder as a residual of head trauma have both been denied.
The deciding factor: The claims were denied because the earliest communication from the Veteran that can be interpreted as a claim was received on September 6, 2006, more than one year after his discharge from service. The effective date for service connection is set at the date of receipt of the claim or the date entitlement arose, whichever is later.
- Claimed conditions
- organic mood disorder, organic amnestic disorder
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- August 25, 2011
- Citation
- 1131235
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1131235.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for SMC based on aid and attendance and housebound status, finding that he did not require regular aid and assistance or be permanently housebound due to his service-connected conditions. The decision also noted that non-service-connected disabilities contributed to his limitations.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has granted an effective date of December 23, 1993 for the award of service connection for PTSD and related conditions. The issue of whether there was clear and unmistakable error in the April and September 1994 rating decisions is dismissed as moot due to the grant of earlier effective date. The TDIU claim remains pending.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for earlier effective dates for service connection and TDIU, finding no clear and unmistakable error in the March 2009 decision and concluding that new evidence would not have changed the outcome.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for additional medical examinations and opinions regarding his acquired psychiatric disorders, including TBI, PTSD, and bipolar disorder. The claims are currently pending.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.