The Veteran's claim for service connection for a back disability, including dextroscoliosis of the dorsal spine and short right leg, is being remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining relevant medical records and scheduling an examination.
The deciding factor: Additional evidence was received that existed at the time of prior adjudications, necessitating readjudication without the requirement of new and material evidence. The claim requires further development, including obtaining relevant service department records and scheduling a VA examination to determine the nature and etiology of any current disability characterized by right leg shortening, dextroscoliosis, muscle spasm, low back pain, and/or chronic low back strain.
- Claimed conditions
- dextroscoliosis of the dorsal spine, short right leg
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 30, 2011
- Citation
- 1131970
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1131970.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for service connection for back disability, including dextroscoliosis of the dorsal spine and short right leg, is being remanded due to the need for additional medical examination and consideration of new evidence.
- Remanded (sent back)
The veteran's claims for service connection are being remanded to the RO due to the need for further examination and development of evidence.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.