Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for further development, including clarification of the Under Secretary's January 2011 opinion regarding ionizing radiation exposure and tobacco use during service.

The deciding factor: The case requires a clarification of the Under Secretary's previous opinion due to new evidence suggesting a synergistic effect between ionizing radiation and smoking on the Veteran's condition.

Claimed conditions
acute myelocytic leukemia
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
September 6, 2011
Citation
1132785

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1132785.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.