The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for service connection of chronic schizoaffective disorder was denied as there is no evidence of a formal or informal claim prior to February 16, 2007.
The deciding factor: There is no evidence of a formal or informal claim submitted by the Veteran prior to February 16, 2007 for service connection of chronic schizoaffective disorder.
- Claimed conditions
- chronic schizoaffective disorder
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 19, 2011
- Citation
- 1134961
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1134961.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for a VA examination to determine if the Veteran's current psychiatric disorders are related to his service, including chest pains possibly related to anxiety. The claim will be readjudicated after obtaining updated treatment records and scheduling an examination.
- Granted
The Board has reopened the Veteran's claim of service connection for paranoid schizophrenia and chronic schizoaffective disorder due to new evidence showing symptoms close to separation from service. The Board finds that these conditions are related to service, as evidenced by a history of psychiatric symptoms since service and continuous medication control.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.