The Board has remanded the case for additional development of medical records and readjudication of the Veteran's claim for an increased rating for multiple retained metal fragments and a history of low back pain and arthritis, as residuals of a gunshot wound of the abdomen.
The deciding factor: The case was previously remanded by the Board to obtain updated treatment records from various VA medical centers. The current decision orders these records to be obtained again and the claim is being remanded for further review.
- Claimed conditions
- multiple retained metal fragments, history of low back pain and arthritis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 20, 2011
- Citation
- 1135255
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1135255.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including a new VA examination to assess his employability and entitlement to special monthly compensation (SMC) due to service-connected disabilities. The issues of increased rating and TDIU are inextricably intertwined.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for his service-connected multiple retained metal fragments and low back pain and arthritis is being remanded due to the need for additional VA examinations, records from SSA, and further adjudication.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.