The Board has determined that there is not enough evidence to support the Veteran's claim of service connection for bilateral knee degenerative joint disease (DJD) and arthritis of the knees. The preponderance of the evidence does not show a direct relationship between his current condition and his military service.
The deciding factor: The March 2011 VA examiner found that the Veteran's bilateral knee DJD is less likely than not related to his work on the flight line, and more likely than not related to the effects of aging, morbid obesity, the effects of musculoskeletal deconditioning due to physical inactivity, and a genetic predisposition to developing osteoarthritic conditions.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral knee degenerative joint disease (DJD), arthritis of the knees
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 30, 2011
- Citation
- 1137326
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1137326.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that new and relevant evidence has been presented to warrant readjudication of the claim for service connection for arthritis of the knees, elbows, and hands. The matter is being remanded for further consideration on a secondary basis due to the Veteran's assertions regarding his hips locking and falling into foxholes.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's eligibility for the Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) is being remanded due to a lack of adequate explanation in the VA opinion regarding whether the Veteran requires personal care services based on the criteria listed in 38 U.S.C. § 1720G(a)(2)(C) and 38 C.F.R. § 71.20(a)(3).
- Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for bilateral knee degenerative joint disease and right shoulder DJD, but denied service connection for a compensable rating for scar, right bunionectomy, bilateral hearing loss (BHL), and right radiculopathy.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate VA examination and opinion regarding service connection for hypertension. The Veteran's hypertension is being evaluated in relation to his service-connected bilateral knee DJD, but the examiner did not address whether the Veteran's above normal blood pressure readings were related to his service or if they were aggravated by his service-connected condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.